Practical Ways to Assess Sustainability

Agroscope has developed the foundation of a methodology for assessing the sustainability of Swiss farms. From summer 2016, a set of indicators will be tested on around ten farms. Sustainably managed farms form an important basis for healthy, fit-for-the-future food production.

The assessment of a farm’s sustainability is a vital step in its optimisation. Here, equal consideration must be given to the criteria concerning the three dimensions of environment, economy and society. Agroscope has developed appropriate indicators, and published these in May 2016 in the ‘Agroscope Science’ publication series.

These indicators are the foundation for enabling farmers, consumers and associations as well as interested actors and stakeholders from production, processing and trade to develop a comprehensive farm sustainability assessment. Particular attention is devoted by Agroscope to the social dimension. This field still lacks sufficient resilient and practical indicators that are tailor-made for Swiss farms.

Well-being concept for human well-being

Four project teams developed indicators for assessing social sustainability, with a focus on the three areas of human well-being, animal welfare, and landscape aesthetics. Here, it was shown that the Well-being Concept of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) represents a good basis for depicting the various aspects of human well-being. To this end, key questions allowing the relevant topics to be described simply and concisely were developed for each sub-aspect such as e.g. work/life balance, social relationships and subjective well-being. 

Owing to the relevance of the topic for agriculture, a project team devoted itself to the calculation of temporal workload. On the basis of the ‘ART Work Budget’ software developed by Agroscope to calculate the expected working time, we derived an indicator by comparing the theoretically derived working-time input and the workforce available on the farm. 

Point system for animal welfare

A further project team noted that using a simple indicator to assess animal welfare cannot cover all of the requirements. The researchers therefore propose a point system that manages without observations or measurements on the animal itself. In this system, points are awarded to measures with an anticipated positive impact on one of the twelve animal welfare aspects taken into account in the existing Welfare®-Quality Protocol measuring instrument, e.g. freedom of movement or the absence of pain.  In order for points to be awarded, the anticipated animal welfare must go beyond the minimum stipulated in the Swiss Animal Protection Law. Follow-up projects will now aim to determine whether a correlation does in fact exist between the number of points awarded and the level of animal welfare.

Indicators for the economy and environment

Agroscope has also developed indicators for the economic and environmental dimensions; detailed information on these can be found in the relevant Agroscope publication of May 2016. The economic sustainability of a farm can be illustrated by two key figures in each of the following areas: profitability (earned income per family labour unit and total return on capital); liquidity (cashflow-turnover rate and dynamic gearing ratio), and stability (investment intensity and investment coverage). The environmental dimension of sustainability encompasses the components of resource efficiency, effects on climate, nutrients, and ecotoxicity, as well as biodiversity and soil quality. 

Practicability, utility, acceptance

Practical testing of the indicator set is carried out in close cooperation with the involved farmers. The test determines the practicability, utility and acceptance of a sustainability assessment at farm level. In addition to the refinement of the indicator set, a scientific analysis of the results is planned. The project will be concluded with an in-depth report at the end of 2019. The results obtained are meant to contribute to the implementation of a practical solution for assessing sustainability on a large number of farms. The project is financially supported by the Migros Cooperative Association (MGB). IP-Suisse is actively involved in data acquisition.

Further information:

Publications Beatrice Schüpbach

Lindemann-Matthies, P., Briegel, R., Schüpbach B., Junge, X.
Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: The impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity.
Landscape and Urban Planning, 98, (2), 2010, 99-109.

Walter T., Grünig A., Schüpbach B., Schmid, W.
Indicateurs permettant d'évaluer la qualité de la biodiversité dans les pâturages peu intensifs en Suisse.
In: Pastoralismes et entomofaune. Pastum hors-série, Publ. Jean-Pierre Lumaret, Paris, Association Française de Pastoralisme, CEFE et Cardère éditeur. 2010, 45-50.

Beatrice Schüpbach, Xenia Junge, Reinold Briegel, Petra Lindemann-Matties, Thomas Walter
Ästhetische Bewertung landwirtschaftlicher Kulturen durch die Bevölkerung.
ART-Schriftenreihe, 10, 2009, 1-136.

Aviron, S., Nitsch, H., Jeanneret P., Buholzer Hons S., Luka, H., Pfiffner, L., Pozzi, S., Schüpbach B., Walter T., Herzog F.
Ecological cross compliance promotes farmland biodiversity in Switzerland.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, (5), 2009, 247-252.

Szerencsits E., Schüpbach B., Conradin, H., Grünig A., Walter T.
Les types de paysages agricoles de Suisse : Rapport ART 712.
Technique Agricole, 11, 2009, 54-61.

Neumann, B., Lütz, M., Schüpbach B., Szerencsits E.
Spatial modelling for the development of agri-environmental programs.
Regional Environmental Change, 9, 2009, 197-204.

Schüpbach B., Junge, X., Lindemann Matthies, P., Walter T.
Ästhetische Bewertung landwirtschaftlicher Kulturen und Landschaften - La valeur esthétique des cultures et des paysages agricoles.
Inside, 3, 2009, 22-24.

Erich Szerencsits, Beatrice Schüpbach, Hans Conradin, Andreas Grünig, Thomas Walter
Agrarlandschaftstypen der Schweiz.
ART-Bericht, (712), 2009, 1-4.
other Languages: french

Beatrice Schüpbach, Xenia Junge, Petra Lindenmann-Matthies
Agrarlandschaften im Mittelland und ihre Wertschätzung durch Landwirte und Bevölkerung.

Beatrice Schüpbach, Kurt Zgraggen, Erich Szerencsits
Incentives for low-input land-use types and their influence on the attractiveness of landscapes.
Agriculture, 89, 2008, 222-233.

Aviron S., Jeanneret P., Schüpbach B., Herzog F.
Effects of agri-environmental measures, site and landscape conditions on butterfly diversity of Swiss grassland.
Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 122, 2007, 295-304.

Erich Szerencsits, Beatrice Schüpbach, Hans Conradin, Andreas Grünig, Thomas Walter
Semiautomatic delineation of landscape types in the alpin region.

Stéphanie Aviron, Felix Herzog, Iris Klaus, H. Luka, L. Pfiffner, Beatrice Schüpbach, Philippe Jeanneret
Effects of Swiss agri-environmental measures on arthropod biodiversity in arable landscapes.
Aspects of Applied Biology, 81, 2007, 101-109.

Myriam Charollis, Yaelle Berrebi, Valérie Miéville-Ott, Beatrice Schüpbach, Thomas Walter, Erich Szerencsits, Corina Höppner, Marcel Hunziker
Entretien du paysage rural et agriculture: développement d'un système d'encouragement. Rapport de projet.

Erich Szerencsits, Beatrice Schüpbach, Hans Conradin, Andreas Grünig, Jakob Nievergelt, Thomas Walter
Landschaftstypologie Schweiz - Grundlagenanalyse. Beschreibung der Gliederungskriterien und Typen.

Felix Herzog, Serge Buholzer, Suzanne Dreier, Gabriela Hofer, Philippe Jeanneret, Lukas Pfiffner, Thomas Poiger, Volker Prasuhn, Walter Richner, Beatrice Schüpbach, Ernst Spiess, M. Spiess, Thomas Walter, Michael Winzeler
Das Agrar-Umweltprogramm un der Schweiz. Wirkung auf Biodiversität und Wasserqualität.
Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, 403, 2006, 7-0.

Philippe Jeanneret, Stéphanie Aviron, Beatrice Schüpbach, Thomas Walter, Felix Herzog
The role of ecological compensation areas on spider assemblages in crop fields in Switzerland.
Bulletin IOBC wprs, 29, (6), 2006, 65-68.

Antje Heinrich, Beatrice Schüpbach
Constructions rurales et paysages - Choix d'un site optimal pour les constructions rurales au moyen de l'analyse de visibilité.

Antje Heinrich, Beatrice Schüpbach
Landwirtschaftliche Bauten und Landschaft - Sichtbarkeitsanalyse als Hilfsmittel zur optimalen Standortwahl landwirtschaftlicher Bauten in der offenen Landschaft.

Felix Herzog, S. Dreier, G. Hofer, C. Marfurt, Beatrice Schüpbach, M. Spiess, Thomas Walter
Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and breeding bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 105, 2005, 189-204.

2 / 4
Nachhaltigkeit Kuhstall
Measuring environmental impacts: The new emissions test barn in Tänikon makes a useful contribution to sustainability research.
Nachhaltigkeit Bauernfrühstück Tische
A social affair: During a chat – here, over morning coffee – problems are aired, solutions discussed, and interpersonal relationships fostered.
Nachhaltigkeit Mähdrescher
Cost-efficient: The use of modern electronics will improve efficiency during harvesting in the future.
Nachhaltigkeit Silofutter
A biogas plant produces renewable energy and improves the sustainability of a farm.