Practical Ways to Assess Sustainability

Agroscope has developed the foundation of a methodology for assessing the sustainability of Swiss farms. From summer 2016, a set of indicators will be tested on around ten farms. Sustainably managed farms form an important basis for healthy, fit-for-the-future food production.

The assessment of a farm’s sustainability is a vital step in its optimisation. Here, equal consideration must be given to the criteria concerning the three dimensions of environment, economy and society. Agroscope has developed appropriate indicators, and published these in May 2016 in the ‘Agroscope Science’ publication series.

These indicators are the foundation for enabling farmers, consumers and associations as well as interested actors and stakeholders from production, processing and trade to develop a comprehensive farm sustainability assessment. Particular attention is devoted by Agroscope to the social dimension. This field still lacks sufficient resilient and practical indicators that are tailor-made for Swiss farms.

Well-being concept for human well-being

Four project teams developed indicators for assessing social sustainability, with a focus on the three areas of human well-being, animal welfare, and landscape aesthetics. Here, it was shown that the Well-being Concept of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) represents a good basis for depicting the various aspects of human well-being. To this end, key questions allowing the relevant topics to be described simply and concisely were developed for each sub-aspect such as e.g. work/life balance, social relationships and subjective well-being. 

Owing to the relevance of the topic for agriculture, a project team devoted itself to the calculation of temporal workload. On the basis of the ‘ART Work Budget’ software developed by Agroscope to calculate the expected working time, we derived an indicator by comparing the theoretically derived working-time input and the workforce available on the farm. 

Point system for animal welfare

A further project team noted that using a simple indicator to assess animal welfare cannot cover all of the requirements. The researchers therefore propose a point system that manages without observations or measurements on the animal itself. In this system, points are awarded to measures with an anticipated positive impact on one of the twelve animal welfare aspects taken into account in the existing Welfare®-Quality Protocol measuring instrument, e.g. freedom of movement or the absence of pain.  In order for points to be awarded, the anticipated animal welfare must go beyond the minimum stipulated in the Swiss Animal Protection Law. Follow-up projects will now aim to determine whether a correlation does in fact exist between the number of points awarded and the level of animal welfare.

Indicators for the economy and environment

Agroscope has also developed indicators for the economic and environmental dimensions; detailed information on these can be found in the relevant Agroscope publication of May 2016. The economic sustainability of a farm can be illustrated by two key figures in each of the following areas: profitability (earned income per family labour unit and total return on capital); liquidity (cashflow-turnover rate and dynamic gearing ratio), and stability (investment intensity and investment coverage). The environmental dimension of sustainability encompasses the components of resource efficiency, effects on climate, nutrients, and ecotoxicity, as well as biodiversity and soil quality. 

Practicability, utility, acceptance

Practical testing of the indicator set is carried out in close cooperation with the involved farmers. The test determines the practicability, utility and acceptance of a sustainability assessment at farm level. In addition to the refinement of the indicator set, a scientific analysis of the results is planned. The project will be concluded with an in-depth report at the end of 2019. The results obtained are meant to contribute to the implementation of a practical solution for assessing sustainability on a large number of farms. The project is financially supported by the Migros Cooperative Association (MGB). IP-Suisse is actively involved in data acquisition.

Further information:

Publications Jens Lansche

Roesch A., Lansche J., Nemecek T.
Regionalisation of environmental impacts and emissions models in agricultural LCA.
Agroscope Science, 184, 2024, 1-79.

Nemecek T., Roesch A., Bystricky M., Jeanneret P., Lansche J., Stüssi M., Gaillard G.
Swiss Agricultural Life Cycle Assessment: A method to assess the emissions and environmental impacts of agricultural systems and products.
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, In Press, 2023, 1-23.

Lansche J.
Experience sharing: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Databases.
In: Measuring and communicating environmental impacts of food products: Preliminary insights from national experiences. 22. Juni, Paris. 2023, 1-6.

Lansche J.
Einsatz der Ökobilanzmethode in Tools von Agroscope: Bewertung auf Ebene Produkt, Betrieb und Ernährungssektor.
In: 13.Ökobilanzplattform Landwirtschaft. 20. Juni, Zürich. 2023, 1-11.

Roesch A., Douziech M., Mann S., Lansche J., Gaillard G.
Methoden zur Bewertung der Nachhaltigkeit von Nahrungsmitteln: Mögliche Fallstricke und Beispiele.
In: 13. Ökobilanz Plattform Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft. 20. Juni, Zürich. 2023, 1-11.

Roesch A., Douziech M., Mann S., Lansche J., Gaillard G.
Methoden zur Bewertung der Nachhaltigkeit von Nahrungsmitteln: Mögliche Fallstricke und Beispiele.
In: 13. Ökobilanz Plattform Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft. 20. Juni, Zürich. 2023, 1-11.

Reguant Closa A., Roesch A., Lansche J., Nemecek T., Lohman T., Meyer N.
Are athletes environmental champions? LCA case study in sports nutrition.
In: 13th International Conference on LCA of foods 2022. 13. octobre, Publ. Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima (Peru). 2022.

Iten L., Lansche J., Audoye P., Farrant L.
Building environmentally sustainable supply chains.
In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment of Food 2022 (LCA Foods 2022). 12-14 October, Publ. Peruvian Life Cycle Assessment and Industrial Ecology Network and Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima (Peru). 2022.

Lansche J., Stüssi M.
SALCAfuture: developing an expert system for life cycle assessments of agricultural products and farms.
In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment of Food 2022. 12-14 October, Publ. Peruvian Life Cycle Assessment and Industrial Ecology Network and Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima (Peru). 2022, 111-112.

Lansche J., Iten L., Audoye P., Farrant L.
Developing policy recommendations for Short Food Supply Chains in Europe.
In: SETAC Europe 32nd Annual Meeting. 15.-19. Mai, Publ. SETAC, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2022, 1-2.

Lansche J., Iten L., Audoye P., Farrant L., Douziech M.
Developing policy recommendations for Short Food Supply Chains in Europe.
In: SETAC EUROPE 32nd ANUAL MEETING. 15. Mai, COPENHAGEN, DENMARK - SETAC. 2022.

Lansche J., Stüssi M.
The SALCAfuture project: agroenvironmental expertise translated into LCA.
In: 79th LCA discussion forum "COLLABORATION WITHIN AND BEYOND THE LCA COMMUNITY: SUCCESS STORIES, OBSTACLES AND SOLUTIONS". 18.11., ETH Zürich. 2021.

Lansche J., Iten L.
Integrative sustainability assessment.
In: SMARTCHAIN Open European Multi-stakeholder workshop. 06.07., Universität Hohenheim. 2021.

Lansche J.
SALCAfuture - von der Umwelt zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung?
In: 44. Agrarökonomie-Tagung Agroscope. 05. Oktober, Publ. Agroscope, Tänikon. 2021, 1-14.

Reguant-Closa A., Roesch A., Lansche J., Nemecek T., Lohman T.G., Meyer N.L.
The environmental impact of the Athlete’s Plate nutrition education tool.
Nutrients, 12, (8), 2020, 1-27.

Frischknecht R., Pfister S., Bunsen J., Haas A., Känzig J., Kilga M., Lansche J., Margni M., Mutel C., Reinhard J., Stolz P., van Zelm R., Vieira M., Wernet G.
Regionalization in LCA: current status in concepts, software and databases: 69th LCA forum, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, 13 September, 2018.
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, online, (19 November), 2018, 1-6.

Lansche J., Koch P., Mouron P., Gaillard G.
Methodische Herausforderungen bei der Umweltproduktdeklaration von Landwirtschaftsprodukten.
Agrarforschung Schweiz, 7, (3), 2016, 144-149.
other Languages: french

Bretscher D., Lansche J., Felder D.
Klimaschutz und Ernährung.
In: Agrarbericht 2015. Publ. Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft BLW, Bern. 2015, 7-11.

Teuscher R., Lansche J., Nemecek T., Gaillard G.
Optimizing the LCA data processing for food products in the context of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: challenges and opportunities.
In: LCA Food 2014. 10.08.2014, Publ. LCA, San Francisco. 2014, 1-16.

Lansche J., Mouron P., Teuscher R., Nemecek T., Gaillard G.
Creating coherent life cycle databases for ecodesign and product declaration of agroindustrial products: how to deal with contradictory methodological requirements (?).
In: 9th International Conference LCA of Food . October 8 , Publ. LCA, San Francisco. 2014, 1-20.

1 / 2
Nachhaltigkeit Kuhstall
Measuring environmental impacts: The new emissions test barn in Tänikon makes a useful contribution to sustainability research.
Nachhaltigkeit Bauernfrühstück Tische
A social affair: During a chat – here, over morning coffee – problems are aired, solutions discussed, and interpersonal relationships fostered.
Nachhaltigkeit Mähdrescher
Cost-efficient: The use of modern electronics will improve efficiency during harvesting in the future.
Nachhaltigkeit Silofutter
A biogas plant produces renewable energy and improves the sustainability of a farm.