Practical Ways to Assess Sustainability

Agroscope has developed the foundation of a methodology for assessing the sustainability of Swiss farms. From summer 2016, a set of indicators will be tested on around ten farms. Sustainably managed farms form an important basis for healthy, fit-for-the-future food production.

The assessment of a farm’s sustainability is a vital step in its optimisation. Here, equal consideration must be given to the criteria concerning the three dimensions of environment, economy and society. Agroscope has developed appropriate indicators, and published these in May 2016 in the ‘Agroscope Science’ publication series.

These indicators are the foundation for enabling farmers, consumers and associations as well as interested actors and stakeholders from production, processing and trade to develop a comprehensive farm sustainability assessment. Particular attention is devoted by Agroscope to the social dimension. This field still lacks sufficient resilient and practical indicators that are tailor-made for Swiss farms.

Well-being concept for human well-being

Four project teams developed indicators for assessing social sustainability, with a focus on the three areas of human well-being, animal welfare, and landscape aesthetics. Here, it was shown that the Well-being Concept of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) represents a good basis for depicting the various aspects of human well-being. To this end, key questions allowing the relevant topics to be described simply and concisely were developed for each sub-aspect such as e.g. work/life balance, social relationships and subjective well-being. 

Owing to the relevance of the topic for agriculture, a project team devoted itself to the calculation of temporal workload. On the basis of the ‘ART Work Budget’ software developed by Agroscope to calculate the expected working time, we derived an indicator by comparing the theoretically derived working-time input and the workforce available on the farm. 

Point system for animal welfare

A further project team noted that using a simple indicator to assess animal welfare cannot cover all of the requirements. The researchers therefore propose a point system that manages without observations or measurements on the animal itself. In this system, points are awarded to measures with an anticipated positive impact on one of the twelve animal welfare aspects taken into account in the existing Welfare®-Quality Protocol measuring instrument, e.g. freedom of movement or the absence of pain.  In order for points to be awarded, the anticipated animal welfare must go beyond the minimum stipulated in the Swiss Animal Protection Law. Follow-up projects will now aim to determine whether a correlation does in fact exist between the number of points awarded and the level of animal welfare.

Indicators for the economy and environment

Agroscope has also developed indicators for the economic and environmental dimensions; detailed information on these can be found in the relevant Agroscope publication of May 2016. The economic sustainability of a farm can be illustrated by two key figures in each of the following areas: profitability (earned income per family labour unit and total return on capital); liquidity (cashflow-turnover rate and dynamic gearing ratio), and stability (investment intensity and investment coverage). The environmental dimension of sustainability encompasses the components of resource efficiency, effects on climate, nutrients, and ecotoxicity, as well as biodiversity and soil quality. 

Practicability, utility, acceptance

Practical testing of the indicator set is carried out in close cooperation with the involved farmers. The test determines the practicability, utility and acceptance of a sustainability assessment at farm level. In addition to the refinement of the indicator set, a scientific analysis of the results is planned. The project will be concluded with an in-depth report at the end of 2019. The results obtained are meant to contribute to the implementation of a practical solution for assessing sustainability on a large number of farms. The project is financially supported by the Migros Cooperative Association (MGB). IP-Suisse is actively involved in data acquisition.

Further information:

Publications Daniel Hoop

Schlebusch S., Hoop D., von Rohr P., Pausch H., Gazzarin C.
Enhancing culling decisions in Swiss dairy farming: Introducing a tool for improved replacement choices.
Smart Agricultural Technology, 8, 2024, 1-10.

Hoop D.
The empirical economic effect of dairy cow longevity in a Swiss setting.
Austrian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Studies, 32, 2023, 37-44.

Jan P., Schmid D., Renner S., Schiltknecht P., Hoop D.
Die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung der schweizerischen Landwirtschaft 2022: Zentrale Auswertung von Buchhaltungsdaten, Stichprobe Einkommenssituation.
Agroscope Transfer, 506, 2023, 1-8.
other Languages: french | italian

Schlebusch S., Hoop D., Gazzarin C.
Einfluss des Produktionssystems und wirtschaftlicher Faktoren auf die optimale Nutzungsdauer.
In: 46. Agrarökonomie-Tagung. 21. November, Publ. Agroscope, Tänikon (CH). 2023, 1-20.

Hoop D., Jan P., Renner S., Schiltknecht P., Schmid D.
Buchhaltungsergebnisse 2022: Einkommensentwicklung und deren Ursachen.
In: 46. Agrarökonomie-Tagung. 21. November, Publ. Agroscope, Tänikon (CH). 2023, 1-31.

Schmid D., Hoop D., Renner S., Jan P.
Betriebszweigergebnisse 2022 - Stichprobe Betriebsführung.
Publ. Agroscope, November, 2023, 72 pp.
other Languages: french

Schmid D., Renner S., Hoop D.
Exploring within- and between-effects of the factors influencing off-farm work decisions in Switzerland.
Agricultural Economics = Zemědělská ekonomika, 69, (10), 2023, 416-425.

Hoop D., Jan P., Renner S., Schiltknecht P., Schmid D.
Landwirtschaftliche Einkommensstatistik 2022: Stichprobe Einkommenssituation.
Publ. Agroscope, 21. November, 2023, 209 pp.
other Languages: french | italian

Hoop D., El Benni N.
Evaluating the competitiveness of milk production: The effect of joint cost allocation methods.
Agroscope Science, 168, 2023, 1-15.
other Languages: german

Ritzel C., Hoop D., Mack G., Portmann, M., Wallner, A.
Swiss Parks of National Importance as model regions of sustainable development: An economic success story for farmers?
In: 51. Jahrestagung der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Agrarwirtschaft und Agrarsoziologie. 20. April, Lindau. 2023.

Ritzel C., Hoop D., Portmann M., Wallner A., Mack G.
Swiss Parks of National Importance as model regions of sustainable development: An economic success story for farmers?
Land Use Policy, 124, 2023, 1-15.

Stanca L., Hoop D., Sauer J.
Using auxiliary information to improve agricultural statistics: Advantages of the calibration approach over poststratification weights.
German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, (4), 2022, 204-212.

Van Aken A., Hoop D., Friedli K., Mann S.
Udder health, veterinary costs, and antibiotic usage in free stall compared with tie stall dairy housing systems: An optimized matching approach in Switzerland.
Research in Veterinary Science, 152, 2022, 333-353.

Hoop D.
How do direct payments influence machinery investments of Swiss dairy farms?
Austrian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Studies, 31, 2022, 37-44.

Jan P., Schmid D., Renner S., Schiltknecht P., Hoop D.
Die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung der schweizerischen Landwirtschaft 2021: Zentrale Auswertung von Buchhaltungsdaten, Stichprobe Einkommenssituation.
Agroscope Transfer, 451, 2022, 1-8.
other Languages: french | italian

Schmid D., Hoop D., Renner S., Jan P.
Betriebszweigergebnisse 2021 - Stichprobe Betriebsführung.
Publ. Agroscope, Ettenhausen. 4. Oktober, 2022, 72 pp.
other Languages: french

Hoop D., Schiltknecht P., Jan P., Renner S., Schmid D.
Landwirtschaftliche Einkommensstatistik 2021: Stichprobe Einkommenssituation.
Publ. Agroscope, Tänikon. 4. Oktober, 2022, 209 pp.
other Languages: french | italian

Gazzarin C., Bütler A., Anken T., Bravin E., Hoop D., Sax M., Schlatter M., Zorn A.
Kostenkatalog 2022: Richtwerte für die Kosten von Maschinen, Arbeit, Gebäude und Hoftechnik. Gültig bis September 2023.
Agroscope Transfer, 448, 2022, 1-56.
other Languages: french

Hoop D., Schori F.
Short-term impact of a zero concentrate supplementation on organic dairy production.
Economia Agro-Alimentare / Food Economy, 24, (1), 2022, 1-17.

Schlebusch S., Gazzarin C., Hoop D., von Rohr P.
Ecobreed: The economic value of a cow as a selection criterion.
In: EAAP. 02.09., Davos. 2021.

1 / 5
Nachhaltigkeit Kuhstall
Measuring environmental impacts: The new emissions test barn in Tänikon makes a useful contribution to sustainability research.
Nachhaltigkeit Bauernfrühstück Tische
A social affair: During a chat – here, over morning coffee – problems are aired, solutions discussed, and interpersonal relationships fostered.
Nachhaltigkeit Mähdrescher
Cost-efficient: The use of modern electronics will improve efficiency during harvesting in the future.
Nachhaltigkeit Silofutter
A biogas plant produces renewable energy and improves the sustainability of a farm.