Practical Ways to Assess Sustainability

Agroscope has developed the foundation of a methodology for assessing the sustainability of Swiss farms. From summer 2016, a set of indicators will be tested on around ten farms. Sustainably managed farms form an important basis for healthy, fit-for-the-future food production.

The assessment of a farm’s sustainability is a vital step in its optimisation. Here, equal consideration must be given to the criteria concerning the three dimensions of environment, economy and society. Agroscope has developed appropriate indicators, and published these in May 2016 in the ‘Agroscope Science’ publication series.

These indicators are the foundation for enabling farmers, consumers and associations as well as interested actors and stakeholders from production, processing and trade to develop a comprehensive farm sustainability assessment. Particular attention is devoted by Agroscope to the social dimension. This field still lacks sufficient resilient and practical indicators that are tailor-made for Swiss farms.

Well-being concept for human well-being

Four project teams developed indicators for assessing social sustainability, with a focus on the three areas of human well-being, animal welfare, and landscape aesthetics. Here, it was shown that the Well-being Concept of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) represents a good basis for depicting the various aspects of human well-being. To this end, key questions allowing the relevant topics to be described simply and concisely were developed for each sub-aspect such as e.g. work/life balance, social relationships and subjective well-being. 

Owing to the relevance of the topic for agriculture, a project team devoted itself to the calculation of temporal workload. On the basis of the ‘ART Work Budget’ software developed by Agroscope to calculate the expected working time, we derived an indicator by comparing the theoretically derived working-time input and the workforce available on the farm. 

Point system for animal welfare

A further project team noted that using a simple indicator to assess animal welfare cannot cover all of the requirements. The researchers therefore propose a point system that manages without observations or measurements on the animal itself. In this system, points are awarded to measures with an anticipated positive impact on one of the twelve animal welfare aspects taken into account in the existing Welfare®-Quality Protocol measuring instrument, e.g. freedom of movement or the absence of pain.  In order for points to be awarded, the anticipated animal welfare must go beyond the minimum stipulated in the Swiss Animal Protection Law. Follow-up projects will now aim to determine whether a correlation does in fact exist between the number of points awarded and the level of animal welfare.

Indicators for the economy and environment

Agroscope has also developed indicators for the economic and environmental dimensions; detailed information on these can be found in the relevant Agroscope publication of May 2016. The economic sustainability of a farm can be illustrated by two key figures in each of the following areas: profitability (earned income per family labour unit and total return on capital); liquidity (cashflow-turnover rate and dynamic gearing ratio), and stability (investment intensity and investment coverage). The environmental dimension of sustainability encompasses the components of resource efficiency, effects on climate, nutrients, and ecotoxicity, as well as biodiversity and soil quality. 

Practicability, utility, acceptance

Practical testing of the indicator set is carried out in close cooperation with the involved farmers. The test determines the practicability, utility and acceptance of a sustainability assessment at farm level. In addition to the refinement of the indicator set, a scientific analysis of the results is planned. The project will be concluded with an in-depth report at the end of 2019. The results obtained are meant to contribute to the implementation of a practical solution for assessing sustainability on a large number of farms. The project is financially supported by the Migros Cooperative Association (MGB). IP-Suisse is actively involved in data acquisition.

Further information:

Project number: 22.12.20.06.03

Sustainable and Resilient Agri-Food Economy

Die ökonomische Sektormodellierung der Landwirtschaft berücksichtigte bisher einzelne Nachhaltigkeitsaspekte wie Umweltwirkungen oder die Versorgungssicherheit in Mangellagen. Eine solche Betrachtung wird den heutigen Ansprüchen der Gesellschaft nicht mehr gerecht. Darüber hinaus ändern Massnahmen der Landwirtschaft wenig an der Nachhaltigkeit der Ernährung, wenn sich das Konsumentenverhalten nicht entsprechend anpasst. In diesem Projekt wird die Sichtweise auf die gesamte Wertschöpfungskette der Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft und auf alle wesentlichen Nachhaltigkeitsaspekte ausgeweitet. Dadurch können die wirtschaftlichen und politischen Entscheidungsträger bei der Gestaltung der zukünftigen Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft unterstützt und die Diskussionen in der Öffentlichkeit versachlicht werden.

Last Name, First Name Location
Ammann Jeanine Tänikon
Djanibekov Utkur Tänikon
Mack Gabriele Tänikon
Nemecek Tomas Reckenholz
von Ow Albert Tänikon

Ammann J., De Steur H., Schouteten J. J.
Editorial overview: Alternative proteins for foods.
Food Quality and Preference, In Press, 2024, 1-3.

Ammann J., Arbenz A.
Are the public supportive of policy measures for a more sustainable future?
Baking Europe, Winter, 2024, 32-35.

Runte M., Nuessli Guth J., Ammann J.
Consumers' perception of plant-based alternatives and changes over time. A linguistic analysis across three countries and ten years.
Food Quality and Preference, 113, 2023, 1-35.

El Benni N.
Ernährungssicherheit in der Schweiz.
In: Brennpunkt Nahrung. 7. November, Luzern. 2023, 1-16.

Ritzel C., von Ow A.
Ernährungssicherheit der Schweiz 2023: Aktuelle Ereignisse und Entwicklungen.
Agroscope Science, 167, 2023, 1-32.

Ammann J., Nuessli G. J., Runte M.
What consumers think about plant-based alternatives in the US, India and Switzerland.
Baking Europe, Summer, 2023, 50-53.

Ammann J.
Policy measures for a more sustainable diet.
Baking Europe, Spring, 2023, 47-50.

Ammann J., Walter A., El Benni N.
Dataset on digital technologies as learning content in farm manager training in Switzerland and willingness to use farm information systems.
Data in Brief, 48, 2023, 1-7.

Ammann J., Egolf A., Nuessli Guth J., Siegrist M.
Experimental validation of the food disgust scale using olfactory stimuli.
Food Quality and Preference, 107, 2023, 1-20.

Berthold A., Ammann J.
Colours of disgust – an exploratory study on the relationship between food colour and disgust.
Science Talks, 5, 2023, 1-3.

Ammann J., Arbenz A., Mack G., Nemecek T., El Benni N.
A review on policy instruments for sustainable food consumption.
Sustainable Production and Consumption, 36, 2023, 338-353.

Ammann J., Arbenz A., Mack G., Nemecek T., El Benni N.
Politikmassnahmen für eine nachhaltige Ernährung.
Agrarforschung Schweiz, 14, 2023, 8-15.

Ammann J., Arbenz A., Mack G., Nemecek T., El Benni N.
Politische Instrumente für nachhaltigen Lebensmittelkonsum.
In: 10. Nachhaltigkeitstagung Agroscope. 26. Januar, Publ. Agroscope, Zürich. 2023, 1-12.

Ammann J.
Public perception of smart farming.
The European Baking Ingredients Market Report, 1, 2022, 40-43.

von Ow A.
Ernährungssicherheit erfordert eine umfassende Sichtweise.
BauernZeitung, 7. Juni, 2022.

von Ow A.
Ernährungssicherheit erfordert eine umfassende Sichtweise.
Publ. Akademie der Naturwissenschaften Schweiz (SCNAT), online. 2022, 2022, 1 p.

Ammann J., Berthold A.
True colours: Food colouring and disgust perception.
Baking Europe, Autumn, 2022, 14-16.

Ammann J., Berthold, A.
Temporary differences in pathogen disgust sensitivity and the perception of crowded spaces.
Personality and Individual Differences, 201, 2022, 1-7.

Ammann J., Mack G., El Benni N.
Public Perception of Smart Farming.
In: 5th symposium on agri-tech economics for sustainable futures. 19-20 September, Publ. Global Institute for Agri-Tech Economics at Harper Adams University (UK), Harper Adams University (England). 2022, 143-146.

Ammann J., Mack G., El Benni N.
Public perception of Smart Farming.
In: 5th Symposium on Agri-Tech Economics for Sustainable Futures. 19. September, online. 2022.

von Ow A., Arbenz A., Ritzel C.
Ernährungssicherheit der Schweiz - Herausforderungen für die Lebensmittel-Wertschöpfungskette.
In: 45. Agrarökonomie-Tagung Agroscope. 04. Oktober, Publ. Agroscope Tänikon, Agroscope Tänikon. 2022.

Ammann J.
Öffentliche Wahrnehmung der Landwirtschaft und Smart-Farming Technologien.
In: Agrarökonomietagung. 4. Oktober, Agroscope Tänikon. 2022, 1-19.

Bach L., Ammann J., Bruckmaier, R. M., Müller, U., Umstätter, C.
Drying-off practices on Swiss dairy farms: Status quo and adoption potential of integrating incomplete milking.
Journal of Dairy Science, 105, (10), 2022, 1-12.

Mann S., Renaux H.
Five shapes of cognitive dissonance: Using Objective Hermeneutics to under-stand the meat paradox.
Food Ethics, (7), 2022, 1-14.

Ammann J., Jeker M., Spori K., Stössel F., Vrdoljak D.
Nachhaltige Ernährung für den Planeten: Ernährungsgewohnheiten in Quartieren begleiten und verändern: Arbeitsheft 2: Methoden und Interaktionen.
Publ. Melanie Paschke, Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center. 2022, 120 pp.

Ammann J., Umstätter C., El Benni N.
Prognosen zur Nutzung digitaler Technologien im Schweizer Freilandgemüsebau.
Agrarforschung Schweiz, 13, 2022, 34-40.

Ammann J.
Auf Gedeih und Verderb. Von der Wasseraktivität.
In: Voller Energie. Publ. Stiftung Museum Burghalde, Lenzburg. 2022, 149-157.

Ammann J., Walter A., El Benni N.
Wahrnehmung und Adoption von Farmmanagementinformationssystemen unter künftigen Betriebsleitenden.
In: Informatik in der Land-, Forst- und Ernährungswirtschaft: Fokus: Künstliche Intelligenz in der Agrar- und Ernährungswirtschaft; Referate der 42. GIL-Jahrestagung. 21.–22. Februar, Publ. Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), Bonn. 2022, 33-38.

Ritzel C., Ammann J., Mack G., El Benni N.
Determinants of the decision to build up excessive food stocks in the COVID-19 crisis.
Appetite, 176, 2022, 1-12.

Ammann J., Umstätter C., El Benni N.
The adoption of precision agriculture enabling technologies in Swiss outdoor vegetable production: a Delphi study.
Precision Agriculture, 2022.

Ritzel C., Mann S.
Exploring heterogeneity in meat consumption and eating out by using a latent class model.
British Food Journal, online, (28 February), 2022, 1-13.

Ammann J., Ritzel C., El Benni N.
How did the COVID-19 pandemic influence health-related behaviour? An online survey on food choice, physical activity and changes in body weight among Swiss adults.
Food Quality and Preference, 100, 2022, 1-10.

Ammann J., Walter A., El Benni N.
Wahrnehmung und Adoption von Farmmanagementinformationssystemen unter künftigen Betriebsleitenden.
In: GIL. 21.02., online. 2022.

Ammann J., El Benni N.
Digitale Technologien in der landwirtschaftlichen Ausbildung: Eine Onlinebefragung im Betriebsleiterkurs.
Agroscope Science, 131, 2022, 1-26.

Nachhaltigkeit Kuhstall
Measuring environmental impacts: The new emissions test barn in Tänikon makes a useful contribution to sustainability research.
Nachhaltigkeit Bauernfrühstück Tische
A social affair: During a chat – here, over morning coffee – problems are aired, solutions discussed, and interpersonal relationships fostered.
Nachhaltigkeit Mähdrescher
Cost-efficient: The use of modern electronics will improve efficiency during harvesting in the future.
Nachhaltigkeit Silofutter
A biogas plant produces renewable energy and improves the sustainability of a farm.