Practical Ways to Assess Sustainability

Agroscope has developed the foundation of a methodology for assessing the sustainability of Swiss farms. From summer 2016, a set of indicators will be tested on around ten farms. Sustainably managed farms form an important basis for healthy, fit-for-the-future food production.

The assessment of a farm’s sustainability is a vital step in its optimisation. Here, equal consideration must be given to the criteria concerning the three dimensions of environment, economy and society. Agroscope has developed appropriate indicators, and published these in May 2016 in the ‘Agroscope Science’ publication series.

These indicators are the foundation for enabling farmers, consumers and associations as well as interested actors and stakeholders from production, processing and trade to develop a comprehensive farm sustainability assessment. Particular attention is devoted by Agroscope to the social dimension. This field still lacks sufficient resilient and practical indicators that are tailor-made for Swiss farms.

Well-being concept for human well-being

Four project teams developed indicators for assessing social sustainability, with a focus on the three areas of human well-being, animal welfare, and landscape aesthetics. Here, it was shown that the Well-being Concept of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) represents a good basis for depicting the various aspects of human well-being. To this end, key questions allowing the relevant topics to be described simply and concisely were developed for each sub-aspect such as e.g. work/life balance, social relationships and subjective well-being. 

Owing to the relevance of the topic for agriculture, a project team devoted itself to the calculation of temporal workload. On the basis of the ‘ART Work Budget’ software developed by Agroscope to calculate the expected working time, we derived an indicator by comparing the theoretically derived working-time input and the workforce available on the farm. 

Point system for animal welfare

A further project team noted that using a simple indicator to assess animal welfare cannot cover all of the requirements. The researchers therefore propose a point system that manages without observations or measurements on the animal itself. In this system, points are awarded to measures with an anticipated positive impact on one of the twelve animal welfare aspects taken into account in the existing Welfare®-Quality Protocol measuring instrument, e.g. freedom of movement or the absence of pain.  In order for points to be awarded, the anticipated animal welfare must go beyond the minimum stipulated in the Swiss Animal Protection Law. Follow-up projects will now aim to determine whether a correlation does in fact exist between the number of points awarded and the level of animal welfare.

Indicators for the economy and environment

Agroscope has also developed indicators for the economic and environmental dimensions; detailed information on these can be found in the relevant Agroscope publication of May 2016. The economic sustainability of a farm can be illustrated by two key figures in each of the following areas: profitability (earned income per family labour unit and total return on capital); liquidity (cashflow-turnover rate and dynamic gearing ratio), and stability (investment intensity and investment coverage). The environmental dimension of sustainability encompasses the components of resource efficiency, effects on climate, nutrients, and ecotoxicity, as well as biodiversity and soil quality. 

Practicability, utility, acceptance

Practical testing of the indicator set is carried out in close cooperation with the involved farmers. The test determines the practicability, utility and acceptance of a sustainability assessment at farm level. In addition to the refinement of the indicator set, a scientific analysis of the results is planned. The project will be concluded with an in-depth report at the end of 2019. The results obtained are meant to contribute to the implementation of a practical solution for assessing sustainability on a large number of farms. The project is financially supported by the Migros Cooperative Association (MGB). IP-Suisse is actively involved in data acquisition.

Further information:

Project number: 22.12.20.06.01

Investigation of Market Dynamics and the Impact of Market Interventions

Die Schweizer Märkte haben sowohl ökonomische als auch ethische Herausforderungen zu bewältigen. Das Projekt bietet dabei Unterstützung.

Dieses Projekt dient einem besseren Verständnis der Marktdynamik im kleinräumigen, geschützten Umfeld der Schweiz. Dieses Verständnis soll dazu dienen, die Wirkung von nicht-tarifären und tarifären Markteingriffen auf Handelsvolumina, Qualität der gehandelten Produkte, Preise, Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft sowie übergeordnete gesellschaftliche Ziele wie beispielsweise dem Tierwohl oder der Versorgungssicherheit abzuschätzen und so geeignete Massnahmen zu identifizieren. Dabei wird ein breites Portfolio an Modellen und Methoden eingesetzt und ggf. weiterentwickelt.

Last Name, First Name Location
Ammann Jeanine Tänikon
Mack Gabriele Tänikon
Mann Stefan Tänikon

Ritzel C., Mack G., Fiankor D.-D. D.
The long-term effect of COVID-19 policy stringency on consumer food demand quantities in Switzerland.
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 16, 2024, 1-13.

Fiankor D.-D. D., Dalheimer B., Curzi D., Hoffmeister O., Brümmer B.
Does it matter how we ship the good apples out? On specific tariffs, transport modes, and agricultural export prices.
Agricultural Economics, In Press, 2024, 1-17.

Chen Y., Fiankor D.-D. D., Fuli T.
Assessing the effect of the round table on responsible soy certification on soybean exports.
The World Economy, In Press, 2024, 1-25.

Ritzel C., Möhring A., von Ow A.
Vulnerability assessment of food imports: Conceptual framework and empirical application to the case of Switzerland.
Heliyon, 10, (5), 2024, 1-17.

Afesorgbor S. K., Fiankor D.-D. D., Demena B. A.
Do regional trade agreements affect agri-food trade?: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, In Press, 2024, 1-23.

Martey E., Onumah E.E., Onumah J.A., Fiankor D.-D. D.
Non-tariff measures and household welfare: Evidence from Ghana.
Journal of International Development, In Press, 2023, 1-20.

Irek J.
Strong and weak geographical indications: Who gets the highest cheese prices ?
In: EAAE Conference. 7 September, Rennes. 2023, 1.

Fiankor D.-D. D., Lartey A., Ritzel C.
Agri-food importing firms amid a global health crisis.
Food Policy, 119, 2023, 1-13.

Meyer M., Gazzarin C., El Benni N., Jan P.
The structure of Swiss alpine summer farms: An old tradition through a new lens.
In: 33. Jahrestagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie. 27. September, Wien (AT). 2023.

Chen Y., Fiankor D.-D. D., Kang K., Zhang Q.
Assessing the role of institutional effectiveness on carbon sequestration: The case of China's nature reserve policy.
China Agricultural Economic Review, In Press, 2023, 1-18.

Fiankor D.-D. D., Santeramo F. G.
Revisiting the impact of per-unit duties on agricultural export prices.
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 45, (3), 2023, 1472-1492.

Fiankor D.-D. D.
Estimating ad valorem equivalents of non-tariff measures in Swiss agriculture.
Agroscope Science, 156, 2023, 1-35.

Mann S., Beciu S., Arghiroiu A.
Colouring the Balassa index: a hermeneutic approach towards Romanian meat imports.
Ciência Rural, 53, (2), 2023, 1-9.

Loginova D., Mann S.
Measuring stability and structural breaks: Applications in social sciences.
Journal of Economic Surveys, 37, (2), 2023, 302-320.

Loginova D., Irek J.
Russian meat price transmission and policy interventions in 2014.
Agricultural and Food Economics, 10, 2022, 1-28.

Irek J.
Characterizing Swiss NTM trade policy for agri-food products: From technical barriers to sustainability standards.
Agroscope Science, 148, 2022, 1-27.

Loginova D.
Assessing the short-term effect of exchange rate liberalisation on food import prices: The regression discontinuity in time employed for Russian food markets in 2014.
Research on World Agricultural Economy, 3, (3), 2022, 52-67.

Fiankor D.-D. D.
Distance to destination and export price variation within agri-food firms.
European Review of Agricultural Economics, 50, (2), 2022, 1-28.

Fedoseeva S., Irek J.
Within-retailer price dispersion in e-commerce: Prevalence, magnitude, and determinants.
Q Open, (2), 2022, 1-20.

Meyer M., Börner, J.
Rural livelihoods, community-based conservation, and human–wildlife conflict: Scope for synergies?
Biological Conservation, 272, 2022, 1-9.

von Ow A., Möhring A., Ritzel C.
Aufbau eines Indikatorsystems zur Beurteilung der Verletzlichkeit der Nahrungsmittelimporte.
In: SGA-Tagung. 28. April, Frick - FiBL. 2022, 1-14.

Nachhaltigkeit Kuhstall
Measuring environmental impacts: The new emissions test barn in Tänikon makes a useful contribution to sustainability research.
Nachhaltigkeit Bauernfrühstück Tische
A social affair: During a chat – here, over morning coffee – problems are aired, solutions discussed, and interpersonal relationships fostered.
Nachhaltigkeit Mähdrescher
Cost-efficient: The use of modern electronics will improve efficiency during harvesting in the future.
Nachhaltigkeit Silofutter
A biogas plant produces renewable energy and improves the sustainability of a farm.