Practical Ways to Assess Sustainability

Agroscope has developed the foundation of a methodology for assessing the sustainability of Swiss farms. From summer 2016, a set of indicators will be tested on around ten farms. Sustainably managed farms form an important basis for healthy, fit-for-the-future food production.

The assessment of a farm’s sustainability is a vital step in its optimisation. Here, equal consideration must be given to the criteria concerning the three dimensions of environment, economy and society. Agroscope has developed appropriate indicators, and published these in May 2016 in the ‘Agroscope Science’ publication series.

These indicators are the foundation for enabling farmers, consumers and associations as well as interested actors and stakeholders from production, processing and trade to develop a comprehensive farm sustainability assessment. Particular attention is devoted by Agroscope to the social dimension. This field still lacks sufficient resilient and practical indicators that are tailor-made for Swiss farms.

Well-being concept for human well-being

Four project teams developed indicators for assessing social sustainability, with a focus on the three areas of human well-being, animal welfare, and landscape aesthetics. Here, it was shown that the Well-being Concept of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) represents a good basis for depicting the various aspects of human well-being. To this end, key questions allowing the relevant topics to be described simply and concisely were developed for each sub-aspect such as e.g. work/life balance, social relationships and subjective well-being. 

Owing to the relevance of the topic for agriculture, a project team devoted itself to the calculation of temporal workload. On the basis of the ‘ART Work Budget’ software developed by Agroscope to calculate the expected working time, we derived an indicator by comparing the theoretically derived working-time input and the workforce available on the farm. 

Point system for animal welfare

A further project team noted that using a simple indicator to assess animal welfare cannot cover all of the requirements. The researchers therefore propose a point system that manages without observations or measurements on the animal itself. In this system, points are awarded to measures with an anticipated positive impact on one of the twelve animal welfare aspects taken into account in the existing Welfare®-Quality Protocol measuring instrument, e.g. freedom of movement or the absence of pain.  In order for points to be awarded, the anticipated animal welfare must go beyond the minimum stipulated in the Swiss Animal Protection Law. Follow-up projects will now aim to determine whether a correlation does in fact exist between the number of points awarded and the level of animal welfare.

Indicators for the economy and environment

Agroscope has also developed indicators for the economic and environmental dimensions; detailed information on these can be found in the relevant Agroscope publication of May 2016. The economic sustainability of a farm can be illustrated by two key figures in each of the following areas: profitability (earned income per family labour unit and total return on capital); liquidity (cashflow-turnover rate and dynamic gearing ratio), and stability (investment intensity and investment coverage). The environmental dimension of sustainability encompasses the components of resource efficiency, effects on climate, nutrients, and ecotoxicity, as well as biodiversity and soil quality. 

Practicability, utility, acceptance

Practical testing of the indicator set is carried out in close cooperation with the involved farmers. The test determines the practicability, utility and acceptance of a sustainability assessment at farm level. In addition to the refinement of the indicator set, a scientific analysis of the results is planned. The project will be concluded with an in-depth report at the end of 2019. The results obtained are meant to contribute to the implementation of a practical solution for assessing sustainability on a large number of farms. The project is financially supported by the Migros Cooperative Association (MGB). IP-Suisse is actively involved in data acquisition.

Further information:

Project number: 22.16.19.06.01

Biodiversity Patterns in Space and Time

Basierend auf Monitoringdaten wird in diesem Projekt der Zustand und die Veränderung der Biodiversität im Agrarraum ermittelt und damit abgeschätzt, ob die Umweltziele Landwirtschaft im Bereich Biodiversität erreicht werden. Ebenso liegt ein Fokus auf der Evaluation der Biodiversitätsförderflächen und deren Beitrag zur Erreichung der Umweltziele. Gleichzeitig werden im Projekt Einflussfaktoren analysiert oder deren Effekt auf die Biodiversität experimentell untersucht. Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt liegt in der Entwicklung neuer, effizienter Methoden zur Erfassung der Biodiversität im Agrarraum. Das Projekt soll eine breite Wirkung in der Verwaltung, Öffentlichkeit, Interessengruppen im Bereich Umwelt und Landwirtschaft und der Wissenschaft haben. Es soll eine zentrale Grundlage sein, um die Massnahmen, welche die Biodiversität im Agrarraum fördern, zu überprüfen und zu optimieren.

Last Name, First Name Location
Herzog Chantal Reckenholz
Herzog Felix Reckenholz
Knop Eva Reckenholz
Meier Eliane Reckenholz
Neff Felix Reckenholz
Stöckli Sibylle Reckenholz
Winizki Jonas Reckenholz

Herzog C., Meier E., Schneuwly J., Birrer S., Roth T., Knop E.
Effekte ausgewählter Faktoren auf die Biodiversität in Schweizer Agrarlandschaften.
Agrarforschung Schweiz, 15, 2024, 128-137.

Martinez-Nuñez C., Gossner M., Maurer C., Neff F., Obrist M., Moretti M., Bollmann K., Herzog F., Knop E., Luka H., Cahenzli F., Albrecht M.
Land‐use change in the past 40 years explains shifts in arthropod community traits.
Journal of Animal Ecology, In Press, 2024, 1-14.

Meier E., Lüscher G., Herzog F., Knop E.
Collaborative approaches at the landscape scale increase the benefits of agri-environmental measures for farmland biodiversity.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 367, 2024, 1-9.

Blösch S., Zellweger J., Batary P., Knop E.
A systematic review on the effectiveness of crop architecture-related in-field measures for promoting ground-breeding farmland birds.
Journal for Nature Conservation, 76, 2023, 1-7.

Ecker K. T., Meier E., Tillé Y.
Integrating spatial and ecological information into comprehensive biodiversity monitoring on agricultural land.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195, (10), 2023, 1-20.

Herzog C., Meier E., Lüscher G., Knop E.
Integration externer Datensätze führt zu neuen Erkenntnissen: Arten und Lebensräume Landwirtschaft (ALL-EMA).
Hotspot, 47, 2023, 29-30.
other Languages: french

Neff F., Prati D., Achury R., Ambarlı D., Bolliger R., Brändle M., Freitag M., Hölzel N., Kleinebecker T., Knecht A., Schäfer D., Schall P., Seibold S., Staab M., Weisser W. W. and others
Reduction of invertebrate herbivory by land use is only partly explained by changes in plant and insect characteristics.
Ecological Monographs, 93, (2), 2023, 1-26.

Casanelles-Abella J., Fontana S., Meier E., Moretti M. , Fournier B.
Spatial mismatch between wild bee diversity hotspots and protected areas.
Conservation Biology, In Press, 2023, 1-46.

Le Provost G., Schenk N., Penone C., Thiele J., Westphal C., Allan E., Ayasse M., Blüthgen N., Boeddinghaus R., Boesing A., Bolliger R., Busch V., Fischer M., Gossner M., Hölzel N. and others
The supply of multiple ecosystem services requires biodiversity across spatial scales.
Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7, 2023, 236-249.

Hölker F., Bolliger J., Davies T.W., Giavi S., Jechow A., Kalinkat G., Longcore T., Spoelstra K., Tidau S., Visser M.E., Knop E.
11 pressing research questions on how light pollution affects biodiversity.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 2022, 1-13.

Liu Y., Speisser B., Knop E., van Kleunen M.
The Matthew effect: Common species become more common and rare ones become more rare in response to artificial light at night.
Global Change Biology, 28, (11), 2022, 3674-3682.

Lüscher G., Meier E., Plattner, M., Roth, T.
Die Pflanzen- und Tagfaltervielfalt profitiert von Biodiversitätsförderflächen im Grünland - Ist das genug?
N+L Inside, 4, 2022, 30-34.

Neff F., Korner-Nievergelt F., Rey E., Albrecht M., Bollmann K., Cahenzli F., Chittaro Y., Gossner M. M., Martinez Nunez C., Meier E., Monnerat C., Moretti M., Roth T., Herzog F., Knop E.
Different roles of concurring climate and regional land-use changes in past 40 years’ insect trends.
Nature Communications, 13, 2022, 1-12.

Knop E., Meier E.
Synergien mit ALL-EMA.
Hotspot, Sonderheft, 2022, 41-41.

Neff F., Hagge J., Achury R., Ambarlı D., Ammer C., Schall P., Seibold S., Staab M., Weisser W., Gossner M.
Hierarchical trait filtering at different spatial scales determines beetle assemblages in deadwood.
Functional Ecology, 36, (12), 2022, 2929-2942.

Huber N., Ginzler Ch., Pazur R., Descombes P., Baltensweiler A., Ecker K., Meier E., Price B.
Countrywide classification of permanent grassland habitats at high spatial resolution.
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 9, (1), 2022, 133-151.

Meier E., Lüscher G., Knop E.
Disentangling direct and indirect drivers of farmland biodiversity at landscape scale.
Ecology Letters, 25, (11), 2022, 2422-2434.

Neff F., Lehmann M., Moretti M., Pellissier L., Gossner M.
Tracking sucking herbivory with nitrogen isotope labelling: Lessons from an individual trait-based approach.
Basic and Applied Ecology, 63, 2022, 104-114.

Maeder M., Guo X., Neff F., Schneider Mathis D., Gossner M. M.
Temporal and spatial dynamics in soil acoustics and their relation to soil animal diversity.
PLOS ONE, 17, (3), 2022, e0263618.

Herzog C., Meier E., Indermaur A., Winizki J., Lüscher G., Knop E.
Arten und Lebensräume Landwirtschaft – Vielfalt in der Agrarlandschaft erfassen.
Publ. Agroscope, Zürich. April, 2022, 8 pp.
other Languages: french | italian

Nachhaltigkeit Kuhstall
Measuring environmental impacts: The new emissions test barn in Tänikon makes a useful contribution to sustainability research.
Nachhaltigkeit Bauernfrühstück Tische
A social affair: During a chat – here, over morning coffee – problems are aired, solutions discussed, and interpersonal relationships fostered.
Nachhaltigkeit Mähdrescher
Cost-efficient: The use of modern electronics will improve efficiency during harvesting in the future.
Nachhaltigkeit Silofutter
A biogas plant produces renewable energy and improves the sustainability of a farm.