Practical Ways to Assess Sustainability

Agroscope has developed the foundation of a methodology for assessing the sustainability of Swiss farms. From summer 2016, a set of indicators will be tested on around ten farms. Sustainably managed farms form an important basis for healthy, fit-for-the-future food production.

The assessment of a farm’s sustainability is a vital step in its optimisation. Here, equal consideration must be given to the criteria concerning the three dimensions of environment, economy and society. Agroscope has developed appropriate indicators, and published these in May 2016 in the ‘Agroscope Science’ publication series.

These indicators are the foundation for enabling farmers, consumers and associations as well as interested actors and stakeholders from production, processing and trade to develop a comprehensive farm sustainability assessment. Particular attention is devoted by Agroscope to the social dimension. This field still lacks sufficient resilient and practical indicators that are tailor-made for Swiss farms.

Well-being concept for human well-being

Four project teams developed indicators for assessing social sustainability, with a focus on the three areas of human well-being, animal welfare, and landscape aesthetics. Here, it was shown that the Well-being Concept of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) represents a good basis for depicting the various aspects of human well-being. To this end, key questions allowing the relevant topics to be described simply and concisely were developed for each sub-aspect such as e.g. work/life balance, social relationships and subjective well-being. 

Owing to the relevance of the topic for agriculture, a project team devoted itself to the calculation of temporal workload. On the basis of the ‘ART Work Budget’ software developed by Agroscope to calculate the expected working time, we derived an indicator by comparing the theoretically derived working-time input and the workforce available on the farm. 

Point system for animal welfare

A further project team noted that using a simple indicator to assess animal welfare cannot cover all of the requirements. The researchers therefore propose a point system that manages without observations or measurements on the animal itself. In this system, points are awarded to measures with an anticipated positive impact on one of the twelve animal welfare aspects taken into account in the existing Welfare®-Quality Protocol measuring instrument, e.g. freedom of movement or the absence of pain.  In order for points to be awarded, the anticipated animal welfare must go beyond the minimum stipulated in the Swiss Animal Protection Law. Follow-up projects will now aim to determine whether a correlation does in fact exist between the number of points awarded and the level of animal welfare.

Indicators for the economy and environment

Agroscope has also developed indicators for the economic and environmental dimensions; detailed information on these can be found in the relevant Agroscope publication of May 2016. The economic sustainability of a farm can be illustrated by two key figures in each of the following areas: profitability (earned income per family labour unit and total return on capital); liquidity (cashflow-turnover rate and dynamic gearing ratio), and stability (investment intensity and investment coverage). The environmental dimension of sustainability encompasses the components of resource efficiency, effects on climate, nutrients, and ecotoxicity, as well as biodiversity and soil quality. 

Practicability, utility, acceptance

Practical testing of the indicator set is carried out in close cooperation with the involved farmers. The test determines the practicability, utility and acceptance of a sustainability assessment at farm level. In addition to the refinement of the indicator set, a scientific analysis of the results is planned. The project will be concluded with an in-depth report at the end of 2019. The results obtained are meant to contribute to the implementation of a practical solution for assessing sustainability on a large number of farms. The project is financially supported by the Migros Cooperative Association (MGB). IP-Suisse is actively involved in data acquisition.

Further information:

Project number: 22.12.20.01.02

Analysis and Projection of Transformation Processes of the Swiss Agricultural Sector

Das Projekt beschäftigt sich mit der Transformation des Agrarsektors hin zu einer nachhaltigen Bereitstellung von Nahrungsmitteln und dem Schutz der natürlichen Ressourcen.

Es werden verschiedene Teilbereiche des Agrarsystems auf anstehende Paradigmenwechsel geprüft und sowohl auf betrieblicher als auch sektoraler Ebene analysiert. Im Pflanzenbau betrifft dies den Einsatz digitaler Technologien, Nährstoffmanagement und Pflanzenschutz, bei der Tierhaltung männliche Küken und Kälber sowie das Auftreten von Grossraubtieren. Es werden betriebliche Transformationsstrategien analysiert und mittels einer methodisch breiten Herangehensweise Veränderungsprozesse identifiziert und initiiert, die die Nachhaltigkeit des Primärsektors erhöhen.

Last Name, First Name Location
Ammann Jeanine Tänikon
Arbenz Andreia Tänikon
Heitkämper Katja Tänikon
Mack Gabriele Tänikon
Mann Stefan Tänikon
Mielewczik Michael Tänikon
Roesch Andreas Reckenholz
Wang Yanbing Tänikon

Ammann J., Mack G., El Benni N., Jin S., Newell-Price P., Tindale S., Hunter E., Vicario-Modrono V., Gallardo-Cobos R., Sánchez-Zamora P., Miskolci S., Frewer L. J.
Consumers across five European countries prioritise animal welfare above environmental sustainability when buying meat and dairy products.
Food Quality and Preference, 117, 2024, 1-11.

Mielewczik M., Rödiger M., Zorn A., Roesch A., Heitkämper K.
Working time requirements for farm management work in organic and herbicide-reduced production of arable crops.
In: 17. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Landwirtschaft und Ernährung. 5-8 March, Giessen. 2024.

Garcia V., Möhring N., Wang Y., Finger R.
Risk perceptions, preferences and the adoption dynamics of pesticide-free production.
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 49, (1), 2024, 102-123.

Cracco M., Ritzel C.
The effect of Swiss Regional nature parks on agricultural earnings: Evaluating the impact of parks using causal analysis methods.
In: 5th Swiss parks research conference. 12 September, Lausanne. 2023, 1-18.

Wang Y., Schaub S., Wuepper D., Finger R.
Culture and agricultural biodiversity conservation.
Food Policy, 120, 2023, 1-20.

Mink S., Loginova D., Mann S.
Wolves' contribution to structural change in grazing systems among swiss alpine summer farms: The evidence from causal random forest.
Journal of Agricultural Economics, In Press, 2023, 1-17.

Wang Y., Möhring N., Finger R.
Nachbarschaftseffekte und die Umstellung zu pestizidfreien Weizenanbausystemen.
7. März, 2023

Ritzel C., Mann S., van Zyl-Bulitta V.
Prosuming alone or together: A bisectoral approach to conceptualizing the commons prosumer.
International Journal of the Commons, 16, (1), 2023, 295-309.

Ritzel C., Hoop D., Mack G., Portmann, M., Wallner, A.
Swiss Parks of National Importance as model regions of sustainable development: An economic success story for farmers?
In: 51. Jahrestagung der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Agrarwirtschaft und Agrarsoziologie. 20. April, Lindau. 2023.

Wang Y., Delgado M. S., Xu J.
When and where does it pay to be green?: A look into socially responsible investing and the cost of equity capital.
International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 8, 2023, 1-23.

Heitkämper K., Reissig L., Bravin E., Glück S., Mann S.
Digital technology adoption for plant protection: Assembling the environmental, labour, economic and social pieces of the puzzle.
Smart Agricultural Technology, 4, 2023, 1-11.

Wang Y., Möhring N., Finger R.
When my neighbors matter: Spillover effects in the adoption of large-scale pesticide-free wheat production.
Agricultural Economics, 54, (2), 2023, 256-273.

Wang Y., Finger R.
Pest prevention, risk, and risk management: The case of Drosophila suzukii.
Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 2, (1), 2023, 98-113.

Spörri M., El Benni N., Mack G., Finger R.
Spatio-temporal dynamics of grassland use intensity in Switzerland.
Regional Environmental Change, 23, (23), 2023, 1-11.

Mack G., El Benni N., Spörri M., Huguenin-Elie O., Tindale S., Hunter E., Newell Price P., Frewer L.
Perceived feasibility of sward management options in permanent grassland of Alpine regions and expected effects on delivery of ecosystem services.
Environment, Development and Sustainability, In Press, 2023, 1-23.

Haller M., Mann S.
Konsequenzen eines verminderten Pflanzenschutzmitteleinsatzes: Erfahrungen aus dem Kanton Bern.
Agroscope Science, 150, 2023, 1-91.

Ritzel C., Hoop D., Portmann M., Wallner A., Mack G.
Swiss Parks of National Importance as model regions of sustainable development: An economic success story for farmers?
Land Use Policy, 124, 2023, 1-15.

Mielewczik M., Vollmann J., Moll J., Simunek M., Hossfeld U.
Die Bedeutung der Erkenntnisse Gregor Mendels für die Pflanzenzüchtung.
In: Geschäftsbericht. Publ. Gemeinschaft zur Förderung von Pflanzeninnovationen e.V. (GFPi), 2022, 2-5.

Mielewczik M., Moll J., Simunek M., Hossfeld U.
Some oddities on the early origins and inspirations on Mendel´s experiments and the "rediscovery" of the Mendelian Laws in 1900.
Folia Mendeliana, 58, (2), 2022, 17-31.

Mielewczik M., Moll J., Simunek M., Hossfeld U.
A previously unknown meteorological publication of Gregor J. Mendel from 1857.
Folia Mendeliana, 58, (2), 2022, 11-16.

Mink S., Mann S.
The effect of wolves on the exit and voicing exit of Swiss mountain farmers.
Journal of Rural Studies, 96, 2022, 167-179.

Mielewczik M., Moll J., Simunek M., Hossfeld U.
Vererbung und Akklimatisierung: Neue Einsichten aus einer neuen kritisch-kommentierten Edition von Gregor Mendels Artikel "Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden".
BIOspektrum, 28, (05), 2022, 539.

Mink S.
Führt der Wolf zur Aufgabe der Bergbetriebe?
In: 45. Agrarökonomische Tagung Agroscope 2022. 04. Oktober, Agroscope, Tänikon. 2022.

Mielewczik M., Heitkämper K.
Framework zur Abschätzung von Wegstrecken beim Einsatz von Feld- und Schwarmrobotern am Beispiel der Ernte.
In: Arbeit unter einem D-A-CH: Der Landwirt im 4.0-Modus. 8./9. März 2022 Potsdam. 23. Arbeitswissenschaftliches Kolloquium.. 8./9. März, Publ. Leibniz-Institut für Agrartechnik und Bioökonomie e.V., Redaktion Martina Jakob, 2022, 169-191.

Mielewczik M., Simunek M., Hossfeld U.
Mönch und Naturwissenschaftler: Vor 200 Jahren wurde Gregor Johann Mendel, Begründer der Genetik, geboren.
nd.dieWoche, (165), 2022, 23-23.

Mielewczik M., Moll J., Simunek, M. V., Hossfeld, U.
New insights from a new critically commented edition of Mendel’s classic article on plant-hybridization and its role in the transformation of science and agriculture.
In: Mendel Genetics Conference. 22. Juli, Brno, Masaryk University Mendel University in Brno Moravian Museum Augustinian Abbey in Brno Společně, o.p.s. 2022.

Mielewczik M., Moll J., Simunek M., Hossfeld, U.
"Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden" - neue Einsichten: 200 Jahre Gregor Mendel.
BIOspektrum, (28), 2022, 565.

Cloete K., Mann S., Delport M.
Confident or captured? Commercial producers in South Africa.
International Journal of Social Economics, 49, (7), 2022, 976-992.

Heitkämper K., Bravin E., Keller M.
Arbeiten mit digitalen Technologien: Eine Fallstudie am Beispiel von sensor- und kameragesteuertem Hacken und Spritzen im Gemüsebau.
In: Jahrestagung der Charta Digitalisierung. 11. Mai, Publ. Agridea, Sursee, Fenaco. 2022.

Reissig L.
Farmers and their data: An examination of farmers’ attitude towards data sharing according to the stage of digital farming adoption: 3.2.6.
In: Farm data integration – key to cattle management success: COWDATA finale report. Mai, Publ. ICT-AGRI ERA-NET, 2022, 30.

Reissig L.
Einfluss sozialer und psychologischer Faktoren auf die Adaption digitaler Technologien in der Landwirtschaft durch Betriebsleiter und Betriebsleiterinnen in der Schweiz.
In: 42. GIL-Jahrestagung. 17.-18. Februar, Publ. M. Gandorfer, C. Hoffmann, N. El Benni, M. Cockburn, T. Anken, H. Floto, Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI). 2022, 241-246.

Reissig L., Mack G.
Why farmers perceive the use of e-government services as an administrative burden: A conceptual framework on influencing factors.
Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 2022, 387-396.

Nachhaltigkeit Kuhstall
Measuring environmental impacts: The new emissions test barn in Tänikon makes a useful contribution to sustainability research.
Nachhaltigkeit Bauernfrühstück Tische
A social affair: During a chat – here, over morning coffee – problems are aired, solutions discussed, and interpersonal relationships fostered.
Nachhaltigkeit Mähdrescher
Cost-efficient: The use of modern electronics will improve efficiency during harvesting in the future.
Nachhaltigkeit Silofutter
A biogas plant produces renewable energy and improves the sustainability of a farm.