Practical Ways to Assess Sustainability

Agroscope has developed the foundation of a methodology for assessing the sustainability of Swiss farms. From summer 2016, a set of indicators will be tested on around ten farms. Sustainably managed farms form an important basis for healthy, fit-for-the-future food production.

The assessment of a farm’s sustainability is a vital step in its optimisation. Here, equal consideration must be given to the criteria concerning the three dimensions of environment, economy and society. Agroscope has developed appropriate indicators, and published these in May 2016 in the ‘Agroscope Science’ publication series.

These indicators are the foundation for enabling farmers, consumers and associations as well as interested actors and stakeholders from production, processing and trade to develop a comprehensive farm sustainability assessment. Particular attention is devoted by Agroscope to the social dimension. This field still lacks sufficient resilient and practical indicators that are tailor-made for Swiss farms.

Well-being concept for human well-being

Four project teams developed indicators for assessing social sustainability, with a focus on the three areas of human well-being, animal welfare, and landscape aesthetics. Here, it was shown that the Well-being Concept of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) represents a good basis for depicting the various aspects of human well-being. To this end, key questions allowing the relevant topics to be described simply and concisely were developed for each sub-aspect such as e.g. work/life balance, social relationships and subjective well-being. 

Owing to the relevance of the topic for agriculture, a project team devoted itself to the calculation of temporal workload. On the basis of the ‘ART Work Budget’ software developed by Agroscope to calculate the expected working time, we derived an indicator by comparing the theoretically derived working-time input and the workforce available on the farm. 

Point system for animal welfare

A further project team noted that using a simple indicator to assess animal welfare cannot cover all of the requirements. The researchers therefore propose a point system that manages without observations or measurements on the animal itself. In this system, points are awarded to measures with an anticipated positive impact on one of the twelve animal welfare aspects taken into account in the existing Welfare®-Quality Protocol measuring instrument, e.g. freedom of movement or the absence of pain.  In order for points to be awarded, the anticipated animal welfare must go beyond the minimum stipulated in the Swiss Animal Protection Law. Follow-up projects will now aim to determine whether a correlation does in fact exist between the number of points awarded and the level of animal welfare.

Indicators for the economy and environment

Agroscope has also developed indicators for the economic and environmental dimensions; detailed information on these can be found in the relevant Agroscope publication of May 2016. The economic sustainability of a farm can be illustrated by two key figures in each of the following areas: profitability (earned income per family labour unit and total return on capital); liquidity (cashflow-turnover rate and dynamic gearing ratio), and stability (investment intensity and investment coverage). The environmental dimension of sustainability encompasses the components of resource efficiency, effects on climate, nutrients, and ecotoxicity, as well as biodiversity and soil quality. 

Practicability, utility, acceptance

Practical testing of the indicator set is carried out in close cooperation with the involved farmers. The test determines the practicability, utility and acceptance of a sustainability assessment at farm level. In addition to the refinement of the indicator set, a scientific analysis of the results is planned. The project will be concluded with an in-depth report at the end of 2019. The results obtained are meant to contribute to the implementation of a practical solution for assessing sustainability on a large number of farms. The project is financially supported by the Migros Cooperative Association (MGB). IP-Suisse is actively involved in data acquisition.

Further information:

Project number: 22.12.20.01.01

Dynamics of Agricultural Work - Integrating Ergonomic and Social Aspects

Das Projekt verknüpft klassische arbeitswissenschaftliche Studien mit sozioökonomischer Forschung, die den Bogen von der Situation von Fremdarbeitskräften bis hin zu neuartigen Projekten im urbanen Raum spannen.

Im aktuellen Arbeitsprogramm fokussiert sich die soziologische Forschung bei Agroscope auf unterschiedliche Facetten landwirtschaftlicher Arbeit. Dabei werden auch Planungsinstrumente wie die Definition von Standardarbeitskräften auf die Probe gestellt. Neben der ökologischen Dimension steht vor allem auch die soziale Situation der Arbeitskräfte im Mittelpunkt. Das schliesst Familienarbeitskräfte, Fremdarbeitskräfte und neue institutionelle Formen urbaner Landwirtschaft ein.

Last Name, First Name Location
Ehlers Melf-Hinrich Tänikon
Heitkämper Katja Tänikon
Mann Stefan Tänikon
Mielewczik Michael Tänikon
Reissig Linda Tänikon
Roesch Andreas Reckenholz
Saleh Rita Tänikon
Zimmert Franziska Tänikon

Kaiser A.
Transitioning to low-pesticide agriculture: Practices, discourses, and policies.
Publ. Universität Basel, 2024, 113 pp.

Nelson I., Faxon H., Ehlers M.-H.
Feminist political ecologies of agrarian technologies: Knowing the digital differently.
The Journal of Peasant Studies, In Press, 2024, 1-28.

Kaiser A., Samuel R., Burger P.
Toward a low-pesticide agriculture: bridging practice theory and social-psychological concepts to analyze farmers’ routines.
Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 20, (1), 2024, 1-20.

Krikser T., Ehlers M.-H., Profeta A.
Municipal heat provision experiences and expectations in Germany.
Energy, Sustainability and Society, 14, (4), 2024, 1-12.

Saleh R., El Benni N., Masson S., Ammann J.
Public acceptance and sustainability perceptions of food produced with chemical, digital and mechanical weed control measures.
Food Quality and Preference, In Press, 2023, 1-25.

Saleh R., Ehlers M.-H.
Exploring farmers’ perceptions of social sustainability.
Environment, Development and Sustainability, In Press, 2023, 1-26.

Saleh R.
Soziale Nachhaltigkeit aus Sicht der Landwirtschaft.
Publ. Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft BLW, 2023, 3 pp.
other Languages: french | italian

Mann S.
Angestellte in der Schweizer Landwirtschaft: Lohn und Freundlichkeit gleichermassen entscheidend.
UFA-Revue, 10, 2023, 23-26.

Mann S., Bobeică M., Beciu S., Arghiroiu G. A.
Is there a food waste Kuznet curve?: Some evidence from China, Romania and Switzerland.
Environmental Protection Research, 3, (2), 2023, 230-239.

Mann S.
Fünf Franken für den Liter Milch.
Der Schweizer Bauer, 2023.

Mann S., Arghiroiu G. A.
Sustainable food as a three-dimensional system.
Scientific Paper Series: Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 23, (3), 2023, 491-500.

Heitkämper K.
Arbeitsvoranschlag 2023 und Mechanisierungsstufen in den arbeitswirtschaftlichen Tools von Agroscope.
In: 46. Agrarökonomie-Tagung. 21. November, Publ. Agroscope, Tänikon (CH). 2023, 1-19.

Reissig L.
Psychological factors influencing the adoptation of digital technologies in agriculture by farm managers.
In: Conférence ESRS European Society for Rural Sociology. 4 July, Rennes. 2023, 1-14.

Mann S., Loginova D.
Distinguishing inter- and pangenerational food trends.
Agricultural and Food Economics, 11, 2023, 1-18.

Biswas A., Afrad M.S.I., Hoque M. Z., Al Mamun A., Habib M. A., Nayak S., Islam S., Nuruzzaman, Mann S.
Rice variety preferences in Bangladesh: What is the role of public breeders?
Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 41, (5), 2023, 152-164.

Reissig L., Cockburn M.
Neuer Rohstoff aus der Landwirtschaft.
Schweizer Bauer, 20. Mai, 2023, 4.

Mann S., Kaiser A.
Why is agricultural policy not more environmentally ambitious? Comparing failed attempts in Switzerland.
Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 11, 2023, 1-7.

Kimmich C., Ehlers M.-H., Kellner E., Oberlack C., Thiel A., Villamayor-Tomas S.
Networks of action situations in social–ecological systems: Current approaches and potential futures.
Sustainability Science, 18, 2023, 1-10.

Mann S.
Postletale Landwirtschaft: Zur anstehenden Reform unseres Agrarsystems.
Springer VS Wiesbaden. 7. Juli, 2022, 126 pp.

Glück S., Heitkämper K.
Arbeiten mit digitalen Technologien: Eine Fallstudie am Beispiel von sensor- und kameragesteuertem Hacken im Gemüsebau.
In: 23. Arbeitswissenschaftliches Kolloquium: Arbeit unter einem D-A-CH - Der Landwirt im 4.0-Modus. März, Publ. Leibniz-Institut für Agrartechnik und Bioökonomie e.V., D-14469 Potsdam. 2022, 122-131.

Loginova D., Mann S.
Institutional contributions to agricultural producer price stability.
Agricultural and Food Economics, 10, (12), 2022, 1-22.

Ehlers M.-H.
Soziale Nachhaltigkeit aus Sicht der Landwirtinnen und Landwirte.
In: 45. Agrarökonomie-Tagung. 4. Oktober, Publ. Agroscope, Tänikon - Agroscope. 2022, 1-14.

Mielewczik M., Heitkämper K., Bozzolini G., Groher T., Umstätter C.
From manual labour to fully automatized - The bandwidth for the degree of mechanization in Swiss livestock husbandry.
In: Arbeit unter einem D-A-CH: Der Landwirt im 4.0 Modus. 8./9. März 2022 23. Arbeitswirtschaftliches Kolloqiuum. 8 - 9 March, Publ. Leibniz-Institut für Agrartechnik und Bioökonomie e.V., Redaktion Martina Jakob, 2022, 63-78.
other Languages: german

Umstätter Ch., Mann S., Werner J.
A simple measure for workload as a social sustainability indicator for family farms.
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, (14), 2022, 1-9.

Mann S.
Why governments should tax animal production: A system approach to internalize the externalities of agriculture.
International Journal of Sustainable Economics, 14, (3), 2022, 294-308.

Hart L., Quendler E., Umstaetter C.
Sociotechnological sustainability in pasture management: Labor input and optimization potential of smart tools to measure herbage mass and quality.
Sustainability, 14, (12), 2022, 1-23.

Sgouridis S., Kimmich C., Solé J., Černý M., Ehlers M.-H., Kerschner C.
Visions before models: The ethos of energy modeling in an era of transition.
Energy Research and Social Science, 88, (June), 2022, 1-15.

Ehlers M.-H., Finger R., El Benni N., Gocht A., Sørensen C. A. G., Gusset M., Pfeifer C., Poppe K., Regan A., Rose D. C., Wolfert S., Huber R.
Scenarios for European agricultural policymaking in the era of digitalisation.
Agricultural Systems, 196, 2022, 1-14.

Ehlers M.-H.
Digitalisierung der Agrarumweltpolitik.
In: 44. Agrarökonomie-Tagung Agroscope. 05. Oktober, Tänikon - Agroscope. 2022.

Nachhaltigkeit Kuhstall
Measuring environmental impacts: The new emissions test barn in Tänikon makes a useful contribution to sustainability research.
Nachhaltigkeit Bauernfrühstück Tische
A social affair: During a chat – here, over morning coffee – problems are aired, solutions discussed, and interpersonal relationships fostered.
Nachhaltigkeit Mähdrescher
Cost-efficient: The use of modern electronics will improve efficiency during harvesting in the future.
Nachhaltigkeit Silofutter
A biogas plant produces renewable energy and improves the sustainability of a farm.