Practical Ways to Assess Sustainability

Agroscope has developed the foundation of a methodology for assessing the sustainability of Swiss farms. From summer 2016, a set of indicators will be tested on around ten farms. Sustainably managed farms form an important basis for healthy, fit-for-the-future food production.

The assessment of a farm’s sustainability is a vital step in its optimisation. Here, equal consideration must be given to the criteria concerning the three dimensions of environment, economy and society. Agroscope has developed appropriate indicators, and published these in May 2016 in the ‘Agroscope Science’ publication series.

These indicators are the foundation for enabling farmers, consumers and associations as well as interested actors and stakeholders from production, processing and trade to develop a comprehensive farm sustainability assessment. Particular attention is devoted by Agroscope to the social dimension. This field still lacks sufficient resilient and practical indicators that are tailor-made for Swiss farms.

Well-being concept for human well-being

Four project teams developed indicators for assessing social sustainability, with a focus on the three areas of human well-being, animal welfare, and landscape aesthetics. Here, it was shown that the Well-being Concept of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) represents a good basis for depicting the various aspects of human well-being. To this end, key questions allowing the relevant topics to be described simply and concisely were developed for each sub-aspect such as e.g. work/life balance, social relationships and subjective well-being. 

Owing to the relevance of the topic for agriculture, a project team devoted itself to the calculation of temporal workload. On the basis of the ‘ART Work Budget’ software developed by Agroscope to calculate the expected working time, we derived an indicator by comparing the theoretically derived working-time input and the workforce available on the farm. 

Point system for animal welfare

A further project team noted that using a simple indicator to assess animal welfare cannot cover all of the requirements. The researchers therefore propose a point system that manages without observations or measurements on the animal itself. In this system, points are awarded to measures with an anticipated positive impact on one of the twelve animal welfare aspects taken into account in the existing Welfare®-Quality Protocol measuring instrument, e.g. freedom of movement or the absence of pain.  In order for points to be awarded, the anticipated animal welfare must go beyond the minimum stipulated in the Swiss Animal Protection Law. Follow-up projects will now aim to determine whether a correlation does in fact exist between the number of points awarded and the level of animal welfare.

Indicators for the economy and environment

Agroscope has also developed indicators for the economic and environmental dimensions; detailed information on these can be found in the relevant Agroscope publication of May 2016. The economic sustainability of a farm can be illustrated by two key figures in each of the following areas: profitability (earned income per family labour unit and total return on capital); liquidity (cashflow-turnover rate and dynamic gearing ratio), and stability (investment intensity and investment coverage). The environmental dimension of sustainability encompasses the components of resource efficiency, effects on climate, nutrients, and ecotoxicity, as well as biodiversity and soil quality. 

Practicability, utility, acceptance

Practical testing of the indicator set is carried out in close cooperation with the involved farmers. The test determines the practicability, utility and acceptance of a sustainability assessment at farm level. In addition to the refinement of the indicator set, a scientific analysis of the results is planned. The project will be concluded with an in-depth report at the end of 2019. The results obtained are meant to contribute to the implementation of a practical solution for assessing sustainability on a large number of farms. The project is financially supported by the Migros Cooperative Association (MGB). IP-Suisse is actively involved in data acquisition.

Further information:

Project number: 22.09.11.01.01

Official Inspection of Feed

Agroscope ist vom Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft mit dem Vollzug der Futtermittel- und der Futtermittelbuch-Verordnungen beauftragt. Die amtliche Futtermittelkontrolle stellt das erste Glied der Kontrollen entlang der Lebensmittelkette dar und ist Teil des Nationalen Kontrollplans Schweiz und Fürstentum Lichtenstein. Regelmässige und gezielte Kontrollen dienen der Sicherung der Gesundheit von Mensch und Tier sowie des Umweltschutzes.

Dank regelmässigen Inspektionen und Produktekontrollen hat Agroscope einen guten Überblick über den schweizerischen Futtermittelmarkt. Agroscope registriert und lässt Betriebe zu, die Futtermittel produzieren, importieren, transportieren, lagern und in Verkehr bringen (gem. Art. 47 und 48 der Futtermittel-Verordnung FMV). Sie führt Inspektionen in diesen Betrieben durch und überprüft die Umsetzung der Anforderungen der Futtermittel- und Futtermittelbuch-Verordnungen. In den registrierten und zugelassenen Betrieben sowie beim Import werden in Zusammenarbeit mit der Zollbehörde Futtermittel beprobt, welche auf ihre Konformität überprüft werden. Die Planung der Inspektionen erfolgt risikobasiert. Agroscope führt ebenfalls gezielte Kampagnen bei besonderen Betriebstypen oder besonderen Produkten durch. Diese Kampagnen können auch aufgrund einer Meldung des internationalen Schnellwarnsystems RASFF erfolgen. In solchen Fällen oder bei Verdacht, werden gezielte Massnahmen ergriffen, um Betriebe oder Produktarten zu überprüfen.

Last Name, First Name Location
Clément Céline Posieux
Droux Laurent Posieux
Dubois Sébastien Posieux
Hinterberger Thomas Posieux
Weik Dieter Liebefeld

Clément C.
Amtliche Futtermittelkontrolle: Jahresbericht 2023.
Agroscope Transfer, 575, 2025, 1-17.
other Languages: french

Clément C., Félix G.
Risikobewertung bei Agroscope mit PrioTool: Verwendung von PrioTool im Rahmen der Produktekontrolle der amtlichen Futtermittelkontrolle.
Agroscope Science, 191, 2024, 1-55.
other Languages: french

Clément C., Jacobs M., Chaubert C.
Aufmachung von Futtermitteln für Nutztiere: Leitfaden für die korrekte Kennzeichnung von Futtermitteln.
Agroscope. Version 4.0, 2024, 25 pp.
other Languages: french | italian

Dittmann M. T., Baki C., Terranova M., Amelchanka S. L., Dubois S., Wiget A., Leiber F., Krause H.-M., Baumann S.
The effect of biochar supplementation on feed utilization, milk production and methane emission in lactating dairy cows.
Animal Feed Science and Technology, 318, 2024, Article 116127.

Zadravec M., Weiss R., Egert M., Hougs L., Ujčič Vrhovnik I., Marchis D., Schwinkendorf L.-M., Vancutsem J., Engblom L., Heuer A., Gödecke P., Müller M., Eggers T., Smith M., Schumacher P. and others
Survey among European and Canadian feed control units on monitoring packaging material residues in feed by microscopy analyses.
Italian Journal of Animal Science, 23, (1), 2024, 981-988.

Marien A., Fumière O., Roetschi A., Maljean J., Berben G.
A validated real-time PCR test for simultaneous detection of Gallus gallus and Meleagris gallopavo in feed instead of an impossible poultry test.
Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement: BASE, 28, (1), 2024, 1-16.

Clément C.
Amtliche Futtermittelkontrolle: Jahresbericht 2022.
Agroscope Transfer, 529, 2024.
other Languages: french

van Raamsdonk L. W. D., Frick G., Ujčič Vrhovnik I., Zadravec M., Zegers J., Krull-Wöhrmann R., Weiss R., van der Borg G.
Introduction to new guidelines for validation of methods to examine visually recognisable substances.
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 40, (1), 2023, 12-25.

Jacobs M., Clément C.
Informationen für Unternehmen, die Futtermittel über das Internet in Verkehr bringen (E-Commerce).
Agroscope. Merkblatt Nr. 186, 2023, 5 pp.
other Languages: french | italian

Jacobs M., Clément C.
Informationen für Käufer von Futtermitteln über das Internet (E-Commerce).
Agroscope. Merkblatt Nr. 184, 2023, 5 pp.
other Languages: french | italian

Jacobs M., Clément C.
Für Futtermittelunternehmen relevante Gesetze und Verordnungen.
Agroscope. Merkblatt Nr. 185, 2023, 6 pp.
other Languages: french | italian

Clément C., Hinterberger T.
Amtliche Futtermittelkontrolle: Jahresbericht 2021.
Agroscope Transfer, 466, 2022.
other Languages: french

Nachhaltigkeit Kuhstall
Measuring environmental impacts: The new emissions test barn in Tänikon makes a useful contribution to sustainability research.
Nachhaltigkeit Bauernfrühstück Tische
A social affair: During a chat – here, over morning coffee – problems are aired, solutions discussed, and interpersonal relationships fostered.
Nachhaltigkeit Mähdrescher
Cost-efficient: The use of modern electronics will improve efficiency during harvesting in the future.
Nachhaltigkeit Silofutter
A biogas plant produces renewable energy and improves the sustainability of a farm.