Practical Ways to Assess Sustainability

Agroscope has developed the foundation of a methodology for assessing the sustainability of Swiss farms. From summer 2016, a set of indicators will be tested on around ten farms. Sustainably managed farms form an important basis for healthy, fit-for-the-future food production.

The assessment of a farm’s sustainability is a vital step in its optimisation. Here, equal consideration must be given to the criteria concerning the three dimensions of environment, economy and society. Agroscope has developed appropriate indicators, and published these in May 2016 in the ‘Agroscope Science’ publication series.

These indicators are the foundation for enabling farmers, consumers and associations as well as interested actors and stakeholders from production, processing and trade to develop a comprehensive farm sustainability assessment. Particular attention is devoted by Agroscope to the social dimension. This field still lacks sufficient resilient and practical indicators that are tailor-made for Swiss farms.

Well-being concept for human well-being

Four project teams developed indicators for assessing social sustainability, with a focus on the three areas of human well-being, animal welfare, and landscape aesthetics. Here, it was shown that the Well-being Concept of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) represents a good basis for depicting the various aspects of human well-being. To this end, key questions allowing the relevant topics to be described simply and concisely were developed for each sub-aspect such as e.g. work/life balance, social relationships and subjective well-being. 

Owing to the relevance of the topic for agriculture, a project team devoted itself to the calculation of temporal workload. On the basis of the ‘ART Work Budget’ software developed by Agroscope to calculate the expected working time, we derived an indicator by comparing the theoretically derived working-time input and the workforce available on the farm. 

Point system for animal welfare

A further project team noted that using a simple indicator to assess animal welfare cannot cover all of the requirements. The researchers therefore propose a point system that manages without observations or measurements on the animal itself. In this system, points are awarded to measures with an anticipated positive impact on one of the twelve animal welfare aspects taken into account in the existing Welfare®-Quality Protocol measuring instrument, e.g. freedom of movement or the absence of pain.  In order for points to be awarded, the anticipated animal welfare must go beyond the minimum stipulated in the Swiss Animal Protection Law. Follow-up projects will now aim to determine whether a correlation does in fact exist between the number of points awarded and the level of animal welfare.

Indicators for the economy and environment

Agroscope has also developed indicators for the economic and environmental dimensions; detailed information on these can be found in the relevant Agroscope publication of May 2016. The economic sustainability of a farm can be illustrated by two key figures in each of the following areas: profitability (earned income per family labour unit and total return on capital); liquidity (cashflow-turnover rate and dynamic gearing ratio), and stability (investment intensity and investment coverage). The environmental dimension of sustainability encompasses the components of resource efficiency, effects on climate, nutrients, and ecotoxicity, as well as biodiversity and soil quality. 

Practicability, utility, acceptance

Practical testing of the indicator set is carried out in close cooperation with the involved farmers. The test determines the practicability, utility and acceptance of a sustainability assessment at farm level. In addition to the refinement of the indicator set, a scientific analysis of the results is planned. The project will be concluded with an in-depth report at the end of 2019. The results obtained are meant to contribute to the implementation of a practical solution for assessing sustainability on a large number of farms. The project is financially supported by the Migros Cooperative Association (MGB). IP-Suisse is actively involved in data acquisition.

Further information:

Publications Alexander Zorn

Masson S., Buchmann J., Bütler A., Cadot S., De Jong A.V., Mathys P., Rueda Ayala V. P., Seiler A., Steinger T., Vogelgsang S., Wirth J., Zorn A., Jeanneret P.
Rendement et IFT entre parcelles innovantes et témoin.
In: Sitzung der Trägerschaft, Kommunikationsgruppe und Begleitgruppe PestiRed. 21 mars, Publ. IP Suisse, Zollikofen. 2024, 1.

Masson S., Wassef J., Bütler A., Cadot S., Rueda Ayala V. P., Steinger T., Vogelgsang S., Wirth J., Zorn A., Jeanneret P.
Mesures mises en oeuvre sur les parcelles PestiRed de 2020 à 2022.
In: Sitzung der Trägerschaft, Kommunikationsgruppe und Begleitgruppe PestiRed. 21 mars, Publ. IP Suisse, Zollikofen. 2024, 1.

Mielewczik M., Rödiger M., Zorn A., Roesch A., Heitkämper K.
Working time requirements for farm management work in organic and herbicide-reduced production of arable crops.
In: 17. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Landwirtschaft und Ernährung. 5-8 March, Giessen. 2024.

Rödiger M., Mielewczik M., Heitkämper K., Roesch A., Zorn A.
Auswirkungen verschiedener Pflanzenschutzstrategien auf den Arbeitszeitbedarf.
In: Tagungsband des 24. Arbeitswissenschaftlichen Kolloquiums des Fachausschusses Arbeitswissenschaften im Landbau. Publ. Quendler, E., Kajdy, O., Wien. 2024, 80-83.

Bütler A., Zorn A.
Lohnt sich der PSM-Verzicht in Weizen und Raps?
UFA-Revue, 11, 2023, 56-58.
other Languages: french

Zorn A., Bütler A., Mathys P.
Wirtschaftlichkeit des Verzichts auf Pflanzenschutzmittel bei Weizen und Raps: Ergebnisse der ersten zwei Erntejahre aus dem Projekt PestiRed.
Agroscope Science, 169, 2023, 1-31.

Fabian Y., Roberti G., Zorn A., Szerencsits E., Gramlich A.
Die Nutzung von vernässenden Ackerflächen neu denken.
Geomatik Schweiz, 121, (7-8), 2023, 161-164.

Jeanneret P., Buchmann J., Cadot S., de Jong A.-V., Seiler A., Steinger T., Vogelgsang S., Wirth J., Zorn A.
Nützlinge am Rand von Parzellen mit und ohne innovativem und agrarökologischem Ansatz.
In: Agroscope-internes Meeting PSM-Ressourcenprojekte. 24. Januar, Publ. Agroscope, Walierhof. 2023.

Fabian Y., Roberti G., Jacot-Ammann K., Gramlich A., Benz R., Szerencsits E., Churko G., Prasuhn V., Leifeld J., Zorn A., Walter T., Herzog F.
Ripensare l’utilizzo delle superfici coltive periodicamente inondate: Sintesi del progetto «superfici (coltive) umide».
Agroscope Science, 145, 2022, 1-18.

Roberti G., Gramlich A., Benz R., Szerencsits E., Churko G., Prasuhn V., Leifeld J., Zorn A., Jacot-Ammann K., Herzog F., Fabian Y.
Entscheidungshilfe für feuchte und nasse Ackerflächen: Unterstützung bei der Identifikation von Flächen, auf denen Alternativen zur Entwässerung in Betracht zu ziehen sind.
Agroscope Transfer, 449, 2022, 1-68.
other Languages: french | italian

Zorn A., Clémence S.
Bewertung alternativer Pflanzenschutzmassnahmen: Befragungen der Betriebe des Ressourcenprojektes PestiRed.
Agroscope Science, 141, 2022, 1-31.
other Languages: french

Clémence S., Dapčević Hadnađev T., Gellynck X., Haas R., Mastilović J., Meixner O., Pichlbauer M., Plzáková L., Pojić M., Šarić B., Schouteten J., Škrobot D., Van Parys E., Zagata L., Zorn A.
Value chains for new food products: CROPDIVA – D5.1.
Publ. CROPDIVA, Ettenhausen. 2. November, 2022, 95 pp.

Fabian Y., Roberti G., Jacot-Ammann K., Gramlich A., Benz R., Szerencsits E., Churko G., Prasuhn V., Leifeld J., Zorn A., Walter T., Herzog F.
Die Nutzung von vernässenden Ackerflächen neu denken: Synthese des Projektes «Feucht(Acker)Flächen».
Agrarforschung Schweiz, 13, 2022, 198-209.
other Languages: french

Zorn A., Zimmert F.
Swiss dairy farming in transition.
Magazine «agroscope», 6, 2022, 6-7.
other Languages: german | french

Zimmert F., Zorn A.
Direct payments and on-farm employment: Evidence from a spatial regression discontinuity design.
Q Open, In Press, 2022, 1-23.

Zorn A., Clémence S. , Buchmann J., de Jong A.-V., Masson S., Steinger T., Seiler A., Vogelgsang S., Wirth J., Jeanneret P.
Beurteilung alternativer Pflanzenschutzmassnahmen: Erste Ergebnisse aus dem Ressourcenprojekt PestiRed.
In: 45. Agrarökonomietagung. 4. Oktober, Publ. Agroscope, Tänikon. 2022.

Buchmann J., de Jong A.-V., Seiler A., Masson S., Zorn A., Wirth J., Steinger T., Vogelgsang S., Clémence S.
Pesticide use reduction with alternative biodiversity-friendly practices: A case study in Switzerland.
In: INTECOL2022: Frontiers in Ecology: Science & Society. 2. septembre, Geneva. 2022, 1-19.

Zorn A., Clémence S., Masson S., Jeanneret P.
PestiRed: Ein Schweizer Projekt zur Reduktion von PS-Mitteln.
Der Pflanzenarzt, (8), 2022, 6-8.

Gazzarin C., Bütler A., Anken T., Bravin E., Hoop D., Sax M., Schlatter M., Zorn A.
Kostenkatalog 2022: Richtwerte für die Kosten von Maschinen, Arbeit, Gebäude und Hoftechnik. Gültig bis September 2023.
Agroscope Transfer, 448, 2022, 1-56.
other Languages: french

Zorn A., Zimmert F.
Structural change in the dairy sector: exit from farming and farm type change.
Agricultural and Food Economics, 10, (7), 2022, 1-31.

1 / 5
Nachhaltigkeit Kuhstall
Measuring environmental impacts: The new emissions test barn in Tänikon makes a useful contribution to sustainability research.
Nachhaltigkeit Bauernfrühstück Tische
A social affair: During a chat – here, over morning coffee – problems are aired, solutions discussed, and interpersonal relationships fostered.
Nachhaltigkeit Mähdrescher
Cost-efficient: The use of modern electronics will improve efficiency during harvesting in the future.
Nachhaltigkeit Silofutter
A biogas plant produces renewable energy and improves the sustainability of a farm.